Search for tasks- type in keywords

Saturday, 19 September 2015

Refitting Pistons, rings and conrods

Old rings in position
Overall the pistons were in good condition but there was certainly some cleaning required and also the top ring had a gap which was far too large. This seemed to be due entirely to the ring rather than wear in the groove so I went ahead to order and fit new rings.
Piston as removed- 
First step was to remove the old rings which was much easier than those of the smaller pistoned motorcycles I am used to. There is plenty of flexibility and they can be slipped off by hand.

Grooves without rings- muck in top ring
The ring grooves were pretty clean apart from the top one which was dirty with a lot of sticky carbon deposit. Presumably this groove had suffered most because its closest to the combustion chamber and also had the least well fitting ring.

I cleaned the grooves using this Laser tools groove cleaner- great bit of kit and now highly recommended. I then cleaned the pistons using a ro-loc bristle brush in a hand drill.
Cleaned piston ready for new rings
I had ordered a new set of piston rings for the low compression motor (std pistons) from SJsportscars. (Steve's non Lotus alternative). The new top ring was 1.55mm in thickness instead of the previous ring (1.49) and successfully restored the correct ring gap in groove no 1. I am pretty sure that these rings are those described in the handbook as for the 907, but having checked with Steve I was assured that these are also correct for the LC 912. They do however differ from the rings removed; Ring one has no internal chamfer and can be fitted either way up. Ring 2 has an external (note not internal) step which must be oriented downwards and ring 3 is a 4 part system rather than the three part I removed. The lower oil control ring is fitted first. I had never used a 4-part ring before but the instructions I found here:
http://www.deves.com/oilring_inst.html

The set consists of an internal expander (with angular bends), a spacer ring and two rails.

Oil ring set unpacked

Fit the angled expander ring first, aligning the gap with the gudgeon pin (wrist pin)- 12 Oclock

Feed in the convoluted spacer ring, placing its gap at the other end of the gudgeon pin 6 Oclock
Feed in the lower rail, positioning its gap between the others 3 O clock

Feed in the upper rail position its gap at 9 Oclock

This is ring no 2- note the step on the outside of the ring which must be oriented downwards when fitted.
 Add the second ring followed by the top ring orienting their gaps at 1:30 and 7:30 O clock
Ring set in situ.
New  ring set in position, they were all  much more springy than the old rings  and it was particularly hard to keep the oil-ring rails in position in the groove. they tend to spring out easily and have to be checked for correct positioning several times. I checked that non of the ring gaps were in alignment and although there are probably better ways of clocking the rings I was pretty satisfied with this plan.


I removed the old shells from Top and bottom caps by pushing them sideways before clipping in the new ones...



I fitted an oiled ring compressor- checking the ring clock yet again. Its also necessary to check that the compressor does fit closely all the way round so that you can be sure that none of the rings have poked out of their grooves and become trapped on the body of the piston. Note that here the compressor is not aligned at its base (left) - this will allow the rings to spring out when they reach the bottom so make sure that the compressor looks like picture two (right). Remove the liner clamps, oil the bore and add more oil on top of the piston inside the compressor. Insert the con rod into the bore- care not to scratch the liner walls and guide the piston skirt in.  Press the compressor base firmly onto the cylinder liner edge whilst slipping the pistons down to make sure that  the rings have no gap to poke through. However be warned: The compressor does have sharp edges and from experience I would recommend gloves! Tap the piston down gently with the handle of a mallet so that it slips into the cylinder.
As soon as the piston is inside the cylinder refit the liner clamps- you will need to move the piston up and down as you fit the conrod caps and so its essential to make sure that the  liners cannot move.

Add assembly grease to the crank journals and feed the con rod down from the top by pushing on the piston whilst guiding it onto the crank with the other hand. Here the conrod has met the crank...

Before fitting the base cap and tightening the nuts- snug at first. You will need to rotate the crank to get at the nuts cleanly- so make sure the liners are clamped before you do so!
I fitted all pistons and nipped the end caps onto all. Once all were in position I removed the bolts one at a time to oil the threads. Finally I torqued down the bolts to the required 85 ftlb and checked that the crank can still rotate. Its not easy but it did turn.



Here are all 4 pistons inserted and the liners reclamped...



...and all 4 conrod caps tightened down. This motor is an early 912 but despite this it didnt have the oil breather pipe which was left off later models, I left well alone and dint attempt to fit one.











One thing I noticed though was that there was an area of damage on the alloy web of the lower MBP adjacent to the oil pickup pipe.

Some scuffing to alloy edge

This I know wasn't caused by me and checking older photos showed that it was present when I first removed the sump. I think some previous owner has struggled to get at conrod cap bolts by reaching under the oil pickup pipe at some point in the past-. I cant think why as its easier to either remove the pickup pipe or rotate the motor for access but there it is. I need a good seal here as this web will separate an oil from a water filled compartment. I checked that there are no projecting points that would prevent a good fit with the sump/baffle. The sealant should have no problem dealing with these which are not that deep and none of which go right across the web. They were there in the past so presumably had not caused a problem before.

Next job- clean up sump and baffle mating flanges.





Wednesday, 16 September 2015

Here we go again... refitting the modified main bearing... twice!

Well the amalgamated wisdom from both the Lotus 4seater forum and Steve at Sjsportscars was that I had indeed overdone the size of the notch in the rear lower main bearing! A triumph of enthusiasm over wisdom! When I think about it its now pretty obvious that the groove in the bearing forms a ring around the journal which is filled with oil under pressure. As there is no ready exit for this oil, it is forced out of the bearing between the bearing surface and crank journal thus lubricating the bearing. Obviously any exit of oil through the new notch would decrease the oil pressure in the groove ring and thus reduce the amount of oil spreading out across the raised parts of the bearing. Its not the depth of the groove that matters as oil can only leave where the MBP has been filed and that dimension is fixed, however the width is significant and the wide notch I had produced could allow too much oil through and drive the internal bearing pressure too low. There was nothing for it then but to take the assembly apart again and replace the bearing with one featuring a much smaller notch. Luckily the stripping was relatively simple and the MBP (main bearing panel/bearing ladder) came off again in about 30 mins.

I finally received a new grooved bearing and filed a new notch using a much smaller needle file.
Previous grooved bearing (left) and new one filed with a smaller needle file.
(right) Note that the notch no longer extends right across the groove to help
maintain oil pressure in the "ring" around the journal.

Before reassembly it was necessary to remove any old sealant and this sadly took rather a long time. I had been worried about the thickness of a layer of sealant between the MBP and block but on disassembly it was clear that in fact it had spread out really thinly forming a film across the surface of the metal over the low spots. There was nothing visible at all when the metal contacts were closely fitting. One problem was old sealant around the base of the outer (8 mm) studs). This was tricky to remove and in the end I opted to remove all the studs with a 8 mm stud extractor of the "thread-grabbing" type. This was really successful . Once the studs were out any old sealant was easily removed and I could clean up their shafts easily. I could then use the same thread grabber to re-fit the studs (with oiled threads) and torque them in to the specified setting.

8mm stud in process of unscrewing, note ring of old sealant.
 I was then able to refit the crank by laying it into the inverted block in the engine stand.  BUT... at this stage its essential to refit the spray shield. I actually missed this step the first time through; the shield must be fitted at this stage as it cannot be installed after the MBP is bolted on. Yet another strip down then!!  Fortunately the sealants weren't yet dry and it was a relatively simple matter to separate the block and panel and reseal after installing the spray shield.

This is the stuff to stick the sprayshield
onto the block. Don't use too much as it
 squeezes out when the shield is fitted


Sprayshield installed. It has to be slipped up 
from the MBP direction (step facing the block) and then 
rotated before being pressed into the housing in the block 
behind the flywheel mounting flange and lined up with the 
block on the left hand side (RHS ie out of shot in this 
view as block is inverted) 





Sealant applied to MBP






One other point that came to light since I had assembled this part of the motor was that sealant should not be applied to the main bearing pads but only around the "periphery" of the joint. Sadly this isn't defined or illustrated anywhere, and it is not a completely clear distinction since the front and rear bearing pads actually join to the "joint periphery" so who is to tell where to add sealant and where not? I made a "best guess", and extended the sealant where it seemed to form a natural line, but thinning the film across front and rear bearing pads. Since I now know that the sealant will spread out to a simple thin film I wasn't so worried about it this time around. I refitted the MBP and torqued it down (again). Hopefully this is now the last time! I still need to replace the nylon olive on the oil pick up pipe as I've had to remove it when I separated the panel and block again.

I'd intended to replace the dipstick tube grommet anyway but was surprised to find that the grommet fitted was incorrect. I found three O rings stacked up on the tube to achieve the desired thickness. Luckily I had ordered a new one anyway which I installed. I will need to check that the mating flanges are clean and not distorted so that this will seal.

Three O rings (right) found slipped over the dipstick tube and the 
single correct grommet (left) that I replaced them with.

I left the assembled block and panel to set, having checked that the crank rotated freely and turned my attention to the pistons...




Saturday, 29 August 2015

Refitting the crank

I got the crankshaft polished at Southern Rebores near Crawley- great job fellas, really like the satin effect on all the journals.
Polished Crank- clearing all oil ways in the crank... 
I cleared the internal oil ways with a compressed air line.
...and in the block, blasting through from the Gallery along the drilling and also from the bearing holes out
I changed the main bearing shells for the new +10s I got from SJSportscars. One thing I noted was that the bearings as fitted weren't quite right. The lower centre should be a plain bearing and the upper centre a plain-with-hole. All the others are groove-with-hole. This motor had a plain-with-hole fitted in the lower position and a groove-with-hole in the centre upper location. This is probably not a serious problem, at least there was a hole to coincide with the bearing oil inlet, but it wasn't right so I got the right bearings for the 907 motor.
Note incorrect plain-with-hole in centre position of MPB

... and incorrect groove with hole in top centre position
in block
I replaced all the shells with those indicated as correct for this motor in the manual:
Note plain bearing in centre lower position (i.e. in MBP)

Note groove with hole in centre upper position (block)

The rear lower shell required a notch to be filed in its upper edge to allow oil to seep through from the bearing to the newly made groove filed in the MBP. This delivers oil to exiting the bearing to lubricate the rear thrust washer. The manual assumes that it will be possible to obtain a specially modified bearing from Lotus for this purpose. - Perhaps once you could, but these are not available at present, so I had no choice but to file the notch myself. There isn't much to go on when it comes to filing this groove as sadly the illustrations in the manual are of limited use. This shell is a groove-with-hole, yet the manual shows it as a plain; furthermore the location boss is on the left, yet the manual shows it on the right - which none of the various combinations actually have in this position. However the dimension given (0.5cm from the location boss) places the notch within the shell groove which makes sense. However there is no indication of how large the notch should be. The size may actually be critical since too large a hole might allow too much oil to exit the bearing, running it too dry and flooding the rear of the motor leading to rear oil seal troubles. Too small a notch would fail to lubricate the thrust washer. The illustration shows the groove as I filed and fitted it in my first attempt. I formed a shallow notch virtually across the centre groove, but thinking about it later, this may well be too large. I decided to fit the bearing whilst I waited for further information. - OK- foolhardy perhaps but at least it gives me a chance to practice assembly and using the sealant in a dry run. 
Note notch filed in bearing groove below alignment guide allowing oil through to newly
made chamfer. I am not absolutely sure that this is the right size so I may end up redoing this.
I applied red engine assembly lube to all the top shells in the block (block inverted) and including the two thrust washers (copper faces outwards)...
Assembly lube on upper shells (block inverted)
...and then laid the crank in the recess- this was a little awkward as you must ensure that both thrust washers remain firmly back in their grooves or they prevent the crank from dropping in squarely.

Thrust washers pressed back into their recess- journal drops in squarely.

Crank in place in block

The next step was to add Red lube to the shells in the MBP before applying PG307 "Gemlok gasket maker" to the mating flanges of the MBP.  The sealant can be applied as a continuous bead or a continuous film. There are no suggestions as to how this should be done but I chose to do the latter ensuring that the sealant passes inboard of all bolt holes. I also applied it around the bearing shells, I don't think its needed as a sealant here, but assuming that the sealant will have some thickness, I didn't want these to mate at a different distance apart from the periphery of the panel, possibly distorting it or pinching the bearings. 

I don't seem to have a picture of this but it wasn't as easy as it sounds since the PG307 is sticky and tends to form lumps. I do suspect I will be redoing this step of the assembly with a modified rear bearing shell- so if that happens at least I will be better prepared to spread the sealant next time.
The manual states that the nuts securing the MBP are 12mm or 8mm- this is not true they are actually 17mm and 10mm. I sorted out the appropriate sockets plus extensions and pre-set two torque wrenches to the correct torque so that all was ready for quick attachment of the MBP. The MBP then fitted smoothly over the block studs.

A word about studs and nuts; I think a perfectionist would use new studs and bolts throughout the block reassembly. This would be very expensive and I suspect unnecessary because, because the existing ones are in very good condition. I cleaned all studs with a brush and chased their threads with an old tap. All nuts and washers were cleaned ultrasonically before being brushed through with pipe-cleaners or tissue. I oiled the threads and torqued it down. The crank still rotated smoothly once the MBP was fitted so that at least is good news.





Saturday, 1 August 2015

Cylinder liners - honing and replacement

Well dear reader, having decided that the liners in this motor were serviceable but not perfect I set about commencing the rebuild. First was to hone the liners prior to fitting new rings. This gives the new rings something to break in against and the (ideal) 45 deg cross-hatching that honing produces, allows oil to cling to the bore.

For honing I used 3-in-one-oil or ATF- whichever I have to hand to lube the bore. I used a Draper engine hone 56246 covering the range 51-177mm. This comes fitted with 180 grit stones and I bought a set of 240 for a second pass.
Honing unit fitted in cordless handheld drill



Honing in progress, avoid the clamps at the top and avoid pulling the
hone out of the cylinder while running!
To get a 45 degree hone the tool needs to be moved up and down in the bore at the same speed as it rotates. I found this was achieved by using the slow speed setting on the drill and depressing the trigger about halfway. Plunging could then keep up with the spin and 45 degrees hatching resulted. although to be truthful this wasn't as good as I had hoped.
A couple of the cylinders came out I thought rather well.

But others wouldn't clean up properly, some marks remained on the walls and no 4 had some evidence of very slight pitting where I assume that some water had rested on to of the piston during storage. I decided it would undoubtedly be best to fit at least two new liners and if I'm doing 2....

... yes, you guessed it and the inevitable mission creep set in- I ordered 4 new iron liners from QED motorsport and a whole load of bits (shells, rings, gaskets etc.) from SJS.

Christmas comes early in Surrey! Two packets from SJS and another from QED- partly unpacked!

I bought a puller to remove the old liners from eBay- £50. It looked rather puny when it came but in fact it worked very well.
Liner puller- threaded studding looked puny to me but it worked well. I'm sure with a little ingenuity this could easily be replaced cheaply with a couple of bars and some studding.
puller in use...
once the seal of the liners was broken they slid out easily by hand.
The sockets into which the liners had been fitted were a bit mucky but looked OK. However once the liners were out it was possible to see that the lower side of the motor had silted around their bases with sediment from the water jacket. Lots of it! This was highly satisfying to remove and clean out.
Note crud surrounding the base of the liner sockets

It was easily scraped out and rinsed away

Clean block sockets
Hopefully removal of this muck will help cooling.

The new Liners arrived but- as you might guess they just wouldn't fit! The old sockets once cleaned and lubed slipped back in easily, but the new ones - no way!... and I was unwilling to force them.
I cleaned the sockets with a drill-mounted wire brush.
This did the trick and liners 4-2 slid in with silky smoothness with
hand pressure alone

Sockets cleaned and ready
I would also say that it helps if you rotate the block to ensure that the cylinders are vertical so that gravity helps them slide in square, they can jam if they don't get dropped in vertically. The only fly in the ointment was the last liner- in cylinder 1. This just wouldn't fit. The other 3 liners would go into any socket and were completely interchangeable, but this liner would go into none of them. It seems to be an oversize- perhaps a quality control issue for QEDmotorsport to think about? I therefore resorted to the hone and after a several burst with frequent checking I did manage to get this liner into the no-1 cylinder position. It was still tighter than the others though.
At this point I checked nip- you will remember that the old liners were on the low side of acceptable at around 1-1.5 thou in nip. Nip is actually only adjustable one-way. You can remove material from the liner step which will lower the cylinder and decrease nip but there seems to be no way of increasing it. Lotus could presumably sell ring shims to go round the liners but they don't. Thus the nip is simply what it turns out to be... and in this case I was lucky in that the new liners sat slightly higher at 2-2.5 thou. All were the same so all was in order to go ahead and use the sealant to fix them in place.

This is the liner sealant I got from SJSsportscars- its Permabond A1044. Seems to be a thread and pipe sealant and  general engineering adhesive I suspect there are satisfactory cheaper alternatives out there- some of which were probably already in my stock!
Anyway it didn't come with any instructions but a search on the web found them. Degrease thoroughly, abrade surfaces with emery paper, clean and degrease again before applying sealant. Obviously the sockets were already roughened from my brushing, so that left only the liners themselves. The use of methylated spirits wasn't recommended as it might leave a residue (presumably the dye?). Anyway I used meths for an initial degrease, scuffed with 240 grit paper and degreased both liner and sockets again with meths followed by cellulose thinners. Then I applied the sealant.
... before fitting the liners. Now degreased and roughened, all liners proved stubborn to fit. No more silky slide in, all of them needed persuasion with a rubber mallet!  I supported the block from underneath whilst I did this as the block is only mounted at one end on the engine stand. I'm not at all happy with this procedure as the silky fit was more satisfying. I suspect there is something I could have done to ensure that this assembly process went more smoothly and if anybody knows what that is please let me know. Maybe sealant around the base of the liner could have acted as a lubricant? I also think that some appropriate 2-4 thou shim washers would have been a great idea. If positioned under the liner clamps then I could have used the clamps to push all liners down to a specified, matched and accurate nip.

All 4 liners in place

Liner clamps refitted- I tightened then to finger tight and then one flat
more on the nut as I didn't want to risk driving the nip lower.
Finally I left all liners to sit undisturbed for 24 hours before I recommenced the rebuild.  I see on the forum that Loctite 567 is recommended for this sealing job and used as a ring around the shoulder...  Ooops! I - hadn't seen that in time. Well I guess my sealant will have pushed up around the shoulder anyway as the liner went in, but to be at least a little more confident  I think I will test the block by filling it with water to ensure that the liners are actually sealed- even at normal atmospheric pressure as I do NOT want my fluids mixing! Actually at this point I decided that I had scratched the crank with the micrometer in my passion to measure it, so I've now decided to get it checked and polished before refitting- I don't want to endanger my lovely new shells! That will be my next task and hopefully I'll get the crank back before I go on holiday.